Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ

The Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #125 on November 1, 2004:

MOTION:
=======

Upon recommendation of the Curricular Affairs, Faculty Appeals & Oversight, and the Unit Criteria Committees, the Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ Faculty Senate moves to establish a Policy on the Identification and Use of Invalid Academic Degrees.

EFFECTIVE:            Immediately

RATIONALE:           Preservation of Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ�s integrity as a degree-granting institution is very important.  A significant aspect of Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ�s academic integrity is the assurance that Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ students, staff, faculty, and administrators only claim possession of valid academic degrees.  In the last decade, unregulated degree 'suppliers' have become rampant.   Definition and regulation of the use of invalid academic degrees and academic credits at Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ is therefore necessary.

Reputable organizations exist that research and evaluate the quality of academic oversight for degree suppliers and publish lists of accredited degree-granting institutions and non-accredited degree suppliers.  For Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ to create its own �degree evaluation� program is neither necessary nor worthwhile.  Rather, Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê¹ÙÍø×ÊÁÏ should depend on outside agencies for such evaluations.

Reputable organizations include:

UA